Delimitation of the ‘Public’ and Freedom of Conscience: Catholics’ Survival Tactics in Legal Discourses in Utrecht, 1630-1659

Authors

  • Genji Yasuhira Musashi University, Tokyo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18352/emlc.91

Keywords:

toleration, coexistence, public/private distinction, legal discourse, religious minorities, Catholicism

Abstract

This article aims to clarify Catholics’ survival tactics in discourses by analysing legal proceedings against them in the city of Utrecht from 1630 until 1659. This period saw a tendency towards Reformed confessionalisation, as is apparent from the rise in the number of such trials. However, despite the advent of anti-Catholic legislation under increasing pressure from the Reformed Church, Reformed confessionalisation was not completed, as the Catholic presence in the public sphere of Utrecht was never extinguished. Backed by their civic status, and with the aid of defenders in (supra-confessional) socio-judicial networks, accused Catholics developed a variety of discourses during legal proceedings. Obedient conformity to the existing norm of the public/private distinction was just one of the various discursive tactics for survival employed by Catholics in Utrecht. Despite the crucial discontinuity caused by the Protestant Reformation and the Dutch Revolt, Catholics continued to be actors in the constant and communal process of delimitation of the ‘public’. Members of the Catholic social elite in particular could actively create space for survival by discursively mobilising alternative interpretations of the ‘public’ and ‘conscience’ that retained medieval legacies, without conceptualising ‘privacy’ in the modern sense.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Genji Yasuhira, Musashi University, Tokyo

Genji Yasuhira is a JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) Postdoctoral Fellow. He completed his PhD with a dissertation titled Civic Agency in the Public Sphere. Catholics’ Survival Tactics in Utrecht, 1620s-1670s (Tilburg University 2019, funded by the Stichting Adrianus Fonds). This article is written in the context of his PhD research. His wider research interests include religious toleration, coexistence, the public/private distinction, and Catholicism in early modern Dutch history.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-24

How to Cite

Yasuhira, G. (2019). Delimitation of the ‘Public’ and Freedom of Conscience: Catholics’ Survival Tactics in Legal Discourses in Utrecht, 1630-1659. Early Modern Low Countries (EMLC), 3(1), 81–114. https://doi.org/10.18352/emlc.91

Issue

Section

Article